Buffer review - the simplest way to schedule across channels
Buffer is a clean, low-cost social scheduler with a real free plan for 3 channels and per-channel paid pricing. Light on analytics and engagement, but the easiest tool to just start posting - as long as you count your channels.
- Category:
- Social Scheduling
- Pricing:
- Free plan (3 channels, 10 scheduled posts each, 1 user); Essentials $5/mo per channel ($60/yr), Team $10/mo per channel ($120/yr), both billed annually; 14-day trial. X/Twitter posting and analytics are paid-plan only; the engagement inbox is Team-tier; channels past 10 cost less each
- Our rating:
- 🟢 green
- Alternative to:
- Hootsuite, Later, Sprout Social
If the brief is “queue posts across a few accounts without a learning curve,” start here and stop shopping. Buffer does that one job cleanly, and its free plan is generous enough that plenty of solo operators never pay a cent.
Who it is for
Local businesses and creators running a handful of profiles - an Instagram, a Facebook page, a LinkedIn. If you post a few times a week and mostly want a reliable queue, Buffer is the easiest yes in the category. It is not trying to be your analytics suite or your inbox, and for this reader that is a feature.
The real pricing math
The free plan connects 3 channels, queues 10 scheduled posts per channel, gives one user 30-day analytics, and throws in 5 AI reply suggestions a week. Real for a small account. When the 10-post cap bites, Essentials is $5/mo per channel ($60/yr) for unlimited scheduling and the full analytics; Team is $10/mo per channel ($120/yr) and adds approval workflows, unlimited members, and the engagement inbox.
The number that matters is “per channel.” Five channels on Essentials is $25/mo, not $5. Ten is $50. Channels past 10 cost a little less each, but nobody lands at eleven channels by accident - you get there one connection at a time while watching the $5 sticker. Count your accounts before you commit.
What they don’t tell you
The bill scales with accounts, not features, and the headline hides it. Two businesses paying “Essentials” can owe $10 and $50 for the identical feature set.
X/Twitter is the quiet asterisk. Buffer kept X working through the February 2023 API purge that broke a lot of tools, thanks to a long enterprise relationship - so X posting still works. But on the Free plan Buffer cannot pull sent-post data for X, so X analytics and full function are paid-only. If one of your “free 3 channels” is X, that channel is half a channel until you upgrade.
And Buffer is lean on purpose. The engagement inbox - the thing that lets you actually reply to comments and DMs - is Team-tier at $10/channel; Free and Essentials only get limited AI reply suggestions. Analytics are basic next to Metricool, and there is no social listening. It schedules and it reports. That is the deal.
Who should skip it
Anyone who lives in the numbers. If you want competitor tracking and reporting you will act on, go to Metricool. If you need a real engagement inbox but balk at $10/channel for Team, or you want bulk upload and post recycling, Publer gives you more per dollar. And if X is your main channel and you wanted it handled free, Buffer is not that tool.
Bottom line
For simple, reliable, cross-channel scheduling at a fair price, Buffer is the cleanest start in this category. Add up your channels first, because the per-channel model is honest but it compounds. When you outgrow “just post it” and need analytics or an inbox, that is your signal to look at Metricool or Publer.
Compared in
Sources
- Buffer pricing
- Buffer on the Twitter/X API changes (why X still works)
- Using X/Twitter with Buffer - Buffer Help Center (Free-plan data limits)
Last reviewed 2026-07-08.